Group LP 1 2nd Pass
- Due Oct 19, 2021 by 11:59pm
- Points 45
- Submitting a file upload
HW7 and LP MTED394F21.docx Download HW7 and LP MTED394F21.docx
HW7 and LP MTED394F21.pdf Download HW7 and LP MTED394F21.pdf
MTED 394 Group Lesson Plan 2nd Pass Grading Rubric
Component |
Exemplary |
Satisfactory |
Developing |
Emerging |
Lesson Plan |
|
|||
Academic Language Objectives
_____/5 |
4-5 points
Includes clear and measurable/observable objectives. These elements are well-aligned to the lesson. |
2-3 points
Includes objectives. However, some of these elements may not be adequately aligned, may lack clarity, or objectives may not be observable/measurable. |
1 point
Objectives are all present but lack clarity or are unrelated to each other. |
0 points
Objectives are inadequate or missing. |
Hook _____/5 |
4-5 points
The hook is engaging, reflects attention to students’ backgrounds and interests, and leads seamlessly into the objectives of the lesson. |
2-3 points
The hook is somewhat engaging, reflects some attention to students’ backgrounds and interests, and leads loosely into the objectives of the lesson. |
1 point
The hook lacks attention to students’ backgrounds and interest and/or has unclear connections to the objectives of the lesson. |
0 points The hook is inappropriate, not related to the objectives of the lesson, or not provided. |
Formative Assessment Cycle
_____/5 |
4-5 points Multiple opportunities are provided to assess students, and to inform next steps. Commentary is described in sufficient detail. Assessments allow students to demonstrate depth of understanding or skill with respect to the standards/practices/objectives.
|
2-3 points Opportunities are provided to assess students, and to inform next steps. Commentary is described but may be lacking in detail. Assessments allow students to demonstrate some depth of understanding or skill with respect to the standards/practices/objectives.
|
1 point Provides minimal opportunities for formative assessment. |
0 points Provides inappropriate or no formative assessment. |
Academic Language
_____/5 |
4-5 points
Academic Language Demands are clearly stated, are appropriate relative to the objectives of the lesson and Academic Language is a clear focus of the lesson. |
2-3 points
Academic Language Demands are partially clear, are loosely related to the objectives of the lesson and/or Academic Language is mentioned, but it not a clear focus of the lesson. |
1 point
Minimal attention is paid to Academic Language Demands and Academic Language. |
0 points
Academic Language is missing from the lesson plan, or is inappropriately implemented. |
Academic Language Scaffolds _____/5 |
4-5 points
Scaffolds are robustly represented in the lesson. |
2-3 points
Scaffolds are represented in the lesson. |
1 point
Scaffolds are minimally represented in the lesson. |
0 points
Scaffolds are not represented in the lesson, or are inappropriate for the lesson. |
Mathematical Scaffolds _____/5 |
4-5 points
Scaffolds are robustly represented in the lesson. |
2-3 points
Scaffolds are represented in the lesson. |
1 point
Scaffolds are minimally represented in the lesson. |
0 points
Scaffolds are not represented in the lesson, or are inappropriate for the lesson. |
Questioning _____/5 |
4-5 points Questions are thoughtful, represent a variety of DOK Levels, and serve to deepen student understanding related to the content. Questions are a clear focus of the lesson. |
2-3 points
Questions represent only the lower DOK levels (1 and 2) and/or are not a clear focus of the lesson. |
1 point
Questions are included, but lack attention to developing depth of understanding. |
0 points
Questions are not represented in the lesson, or are inappropriate for the lesson. |
Commentary
_____/10 |
8-10 points Presents ideas thoughtfully and in-depth. Ideas are coherently and logically organized. Has an effective, fluent style, marked by language that is generally free from errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure. |
6-7 points Presents ideas in a way that show some depth and complexity. Ideas and language flow well overall, but may have some errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure. |
3-5 points May present ideas in a simplistic and/or repetitive fashion. Ideas may be marginally developed or poorly organized. Language has a number of errors in grammar and usage. |
0-2 points Ideas presented are unclear and/or poorly developed. Language has an accumulation of errors in grammar and usage. |
Total = _____ / 45
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Academic Language Objectives
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Hook
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Formative Assessment Cycle
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Academic Language
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Academic Language Scaffolds
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Mathematical Scaffolds
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Questioning
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Commentary
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Total Points:
45
out of 45
|